| 
 
    While the Paris men's shows for summer 2006 lacked the verve of the previous
    season, they did further illustrate a growing split in men's fashion.
    Changing demographics, the rise and fall of the metrosexual, and the blending
    of codes that once defined gay and straight also play into the picture. Vogue
    USA is launching its first ever men's magazine aimed at a target reader
    earning over $100,000 a year and presumably less interested in style than in
    ambience. On the other end of the spectrum, the Internet is alive with young
    fashion enthusiasts blogging away even as their Ipod blares out the latest
    downloads. The two camps come down to the classic gentleman versus the
    cutting edge.
            
 In fashion terms, the split could not be clearer. Visionaries like Hedi
    Slimane for Dior Homme and Raf Simons in his own name stand at opposite ends
    of the spectrum from the velvety wardrobe envisioned by Stefano Pilati for
    Yves Saint Laurent Rive Gauche, or the opulent look of Marc Jacobs for Louis
    Vuitton.
 
 The world of Dior, that of rock stars, glistening evening wear, dramatic
    tailoring - as in the reversed tail jackets and shorn off boleros shown last
    July - bears little in common with the yachting bon vivant that seems to have
    inspired others, including Ozwald Boeteng for Givenchy. Ditto for Raf Simons,
    who this past season showed in Milan one time out. His sleek collections of
    futuristic pieces are likely destined for a younger, style-conscious
    consumer.
 
 Men's shows can be either terminally dull or ecstatically impressive - and
    sitting through them twice yearly can either lull you to sleep or leave you
    standing and applauding. Mick Jagger, who recently tangled with the White
    House, came quickly into the last Dior Homme show after the lights had been
    dimmed, then bolted back out as fast as lightening. That sort of star power
    does more than generate attention - it gives a clear indication of who is
    wearing what.
 
 One designer that falls somewhere in between is Paul Smith. His latest
    collection was full of fine tailoring, but that little extra punch lets you
    know that his work is not destined for a stuffy men's club. Another look hard
    to classify is Karl Lagerfeld's men's line for Chanel, which combines
    understatement with glittering urbanity.
 
 Elsewhere, avant-garde Belgian designer Bernard Wilhelm tried for street
    smarts, but wound up looking uncomfortably out of place, almost as if he got
    lost on the streets of South Central L.A.
 
 Where men are heading depends on the man. The sure thing is they are in
    opposite directions.
 |