|   Columnist
            Jeanine-Celeste
   Bridge:  High
          Street located in downtown Oxford
   The
            Radcliffe Camera and the Bodleian Library: 
  two
      of the most photographed monuments 
  in Oxfordshire. 
   Two
          British girls at an underground student 
  bar, The Purple Turtle.
   Karl Lagerfeld
            and Erin Wasson modeling pieces 
  from his H&M
      collection.
   Juicy
            Couture's fur-lined parka in military green.
   Alberta
          Ferretti backstage at her Spring 2005 
  Ready-To-Wear show.
   Sienna
          Miller, a reference to the younger 
  generation's counterculture.
 | JC
            writes her column abroad while taking the semester to study
            Journalism and Politics at Oxford University's New College.   The
          humble town of Oxford hardly beckons the "come one, come all" invitation
          seen by way of her swanky city sister: the soiree-throwing, night-life
          loving London. Now during the day, the fact that Oxford isn't awash
          with aboundingly fun events is hardly a motion for heartache. After
          all, we grown-up Harry Potter and Hermione Granger types--in theory--spend
          the afternoons chasing hard-hitting stories or pressing our bookish
          little noses to the grindstone of academia. But once the trusty ol'
          13th century Carfax Tower clock strikes nine, pandemonium breaks loose! The
          gear is switched as student on the school paper revs up to
          become student with a social life. Textbooks are flung out the window
          (not literally of course, although it would be exhilarating), the masses
          hurry out of any one of the University's one hundred libraries and
          drown their worries with a Guinness, a smoke, or perhaps splurge for
          both the Guinness and the smoke. So what is a girl to do when she decides,
          on a random Wednesday night, that she'd like to go to a place just
          a smidgen more upscale, just a bit more hip, then a place rampant with
          beer-addled preppies? The discerning girl will find herself at Oxford's
          most credible club called The Bridge, which, in the
          words of Saks Fifth Avenue, is as close to "the ring on the finger
          on the pulse of the city" as she's going to get.   So
          there I was, loving the sassy frolic-fest atmosphere, sipping a classy
          amaretto sour, singing along to the KitCat version of Christina Aguilera's "Dirty," when
          all of a sudden I'm shimmying alongside Hugh Grant. Well, not exactly
          Hugh Grant (although the celeb did attend New College, that was twenty-five
          years ago) but this boy was a dead ringer, complete with the twinkling
          eyes and all. We attempted to carry on a conversation, but could barely
          understand each other over the blaring beats. I kept trying to ask
          him his age, he kept trying to answer with an earnest and enthusiastic, "Yeah!" After
          a few more rounds of confused "I can't..I don't...what are you
          saying?" he finally just grabbed my hand and practically shouted
          down my ear, "I barely know you, and I can't understand you, but
          I think I really, really like you!"   What
          was that? How can he "really really" like me if he can't
          understand me? According to Webster, this is what he would call a contradiction.
          A noun indicating inconsistency; discrepancy. Something that contains
          contradictory elements. Maybe it's the whole cognitive dissonance phenomenon,
          but I've never been comfortable with the idea of contradiction, especially
          when that contradiction exists in conventional wisdom. Grown-ups are
          wiser than children, couture clothing carry more allure than that of
          the mass market, premium ice cream tastes better than reduced-fat,
          love is sweeter in the afternoon. Who can refute these simple truths?
          But no truth is ever quite as simple, especially when you step outside
          your normal periphery. I'm not sure if living alone in a foreign country
          has afforded me this heightened awareness, all I know is that
          I have never been so attuned to the multiplicity that exists in everyday
          going-ons...in fact, I can't seem to ignore them anymore. They pour
          in like daily news headlines, one after the other, working to challenge
          my preconceptions. And whether it is happening on the Paris catwalk
          or on the Oxford sidewalk, contradictions seem to parallel the England
          weather: when it rains, like hell it pours.   "Alice
            in Wonderland: Looking Through the Glass"   My
          arrival to the United Kingdom may have been a week shy of London Fashion
          Week, but what I can't see on the catwalk, I'll see on the streets.
          Some of the preconceptions I've carried with me have been proven true.
          For example, the British do indeed walk as if they have swallowed long
          umbrellas: back straight, neck elongated, prim and proper (something
          my mother had hoped ballet school would instill for me, but to no avail).
          But the notion that Brits are reserved, haughty, and a bit boring?
          To this, I've noticed some shocking contradictions. While I wouldn't
          describe their personalities as vivacious, they are definitely an amiable,
          engaging, at times humorous bunch. During Fresher's Week, I remember
          being thoroughly amused by a handsome law student from Wimbledon who
          pretended he was flamboyantly gay for an entire twenty minutes (he
          was wearing sort of YSL rive gauche Persian-turquoise velvet blazer
          that he looked only too comfortable sporting). He then suddenly quit
          the act cold turkey to tell me the only reason he confessed his love
          for men was because he had assumed everyone from San Francisco loved
          the gays, and then proceeded to ask if I'd be interested in "going
          to the cinema". (I had to give him credit for delivering the most
          original, strangest pick-up line I have ever heard.) I also remember
          being lost on a street looking for the New College bar, pathetically
          clutching a map in my hands, when two Teen Voguish-looking girls enthusiastically
          bounced over to me and exclaimed, "That belt is beautiful! And
          your lovely trousers--are you wearing a skirt or are those trousers??" When
          I told them that I had gotten both the belt and the pants from the Kitson
          boutique in Los Angeles, their eyes grew even wider. "Ooooh,
          lovely," they nodded wisely. One girl siezed my arm. "Come
          with us, we're taking you to a house party!" I was reeled. These
          girls were like my friends from home--where were the cold brush-offs,
          the aloofness? And what were they doing wearing cowboy boots and tassled
          belts? I thought only the girls of the golden West had the moxie to
          wear those. Admittedly, they did look adorable in their gaucho-inspired
          accessories. British girls are darling dressers; after all, they have
          Kate Moss and Sienna Miller for references. They seem to have developed
          a complete counterculture from the conservative, wearied elegance of
          their mummies; these young ladies stroll along the cobbled streets
          with a sort of cool confidence (while I can barely keep from tripping
          and falling flat on my face) that delivers their eclectic, punkish,
          Bohemian chic mix as perfectly executed cakewalks. And by the way,
          I have never seen so many winter parkas galore--funked up fur lining
          compulsory of course. It's like trying to play Where's Waldo, except
          Waldo is the one solitary person on the street who is not wearing
          the Ungaro-esque jacket.  
 |  | 
   
    | "The
      Crossover Designer: Masstige
      Rushes to the Above and Below"  Isaac
              Mizrahi calls his "cou-Target," Michael Kors favors "carpool
              couture," Karl Lagerfeld prefers "Liquid Karl." Actually,
              Lagerfeld hasn't tagged a title onto his recent collaboration with
              the fast-fashion retailer H&M, but Liquid Karl (his cardamom, amyris
              wood and exotic frangipani flower-infused unisex fragrance) will debut
              on November 12th. The fragrance that has been described as "rich,
              creamy and sensual" will be complimented with an eagerly anticipated
              30-piece collection of the legenddesigner's
                creations, ranging from $49.90 tuxedo shirts to $129.90 sequined
              black blazers. Lagerfeld has been quoted saying, "My dream is
              to do very expensive lines like Chanel and Fendi and very inexpensive
              things." When
                I read this, my eyes lit up like candles on a two year old's birthday
                cake. What is going on here? Is this the same designer whose tweed
                jackets, at $4 thou a pop, I have unwittingly accepted as to never
                finding a home in my closet? I'm delighted to say it is. Just in
              time for the holidays--God bless their dear hearts--lofty couture designers
                have donned a much more egalitarian spirit as they revamp popular
              collections to deliver high-fashion chic to adoring, although price-conscious,
                fans. Take Mizrahi: back in June, he presented both his $12.99 Target
                tees and $20,000 Made-To-Order ballgowns with the same models, the
                same runway, the same audience. Mizrahi says that he is "not
                interested in doing clothes that only six people...will understand." A
                little contradictory? Perhaps. After all, his one-of-a-kind, made-to-order
                pieces cater to very particular, high society women, and at $20,000
                he seems very interested. But I'd like to think that
                even the most sang-froid fashionista should spark up a little
                excitement this share of wealth, this mass-market attainability
                of the exclusive world brimming with Calvins, Isaacs and Karls.
                There's something alluring and thrilling in wearing a $25 effortless,
                lovely "Tar-ture" shirtdress
                with your glam-glam Chanel sunglasses. It's a devilish clash. And
                when your friends dish out the compliments, you can demurely accept
        and say, "Thanks, it's Mizrahi."  "Liberty
            and Freedom!"   A
          headline that entails discrepancy is just the kind of sensational story
          that makes the reader do a double-take: it indicates something profoundly
          fluid about the world we live in, as if nothing can ever be stamped
          into finality. Moving to England has exposed me to entirely new situations,
          leading my skeptic eyes to see things in an entirely different light.
          Maybe a contradiction now and then is a good thing; it can jolt a jaded
          heart out of a lull as it offers an element of sweet surprise of something
          you didn't know existed, like biting into a chocolate and discovering
          a delightful mint cream center just waiting to be yummied up. I now
          know that reduced-fat ice cream can most certainly stand its ground
          to premium--I have two best friend cuties, Shrina and Bahar, who can
          testify; they go absolutely crazy for Cookies & Cream Dreyer's
          Grand Light. Backstage at her scintillating spring collection, Alberta
          Ferretti declared her belief that "fashion is a form of freedom
          ... [and] the new lightness reflects a liberation of the mind." In
          the process of liberating my own mind, I've lightened my load of misconceptions
          and learned a thing or two about myself. Most of my friends and family
          would hesitate to call me capable; endearingly naive would be a more
          accurate title. But living in a foreign country without the comforts
          of familiarity has forced me to become more worldly, more independent,
          more capable, to be a little mover-and-shaker without the training
          wheels. And the thing is, I don't think I've ever needed those wheels--it
          was just another one of those things patiently waiting to be contradicted.      |